From the earliest days of humanity, there has been a fascination with the prolongation of life. Whether it stems from a view of life as an eternal experience or simply an aversion to death, the initial swirl of intrigue was potentially documented by ancient alchemical texts and continues to modernity as biotechnology and an inevitable fascination with immortality have wedied science, politics, and philosophy together in a grounded understanding of our urges and desires. It begs the question: can organ sympathectomies be a real way to increase the lifespan of important people? And while the view of an important person is a little myopic, are important people like political leaders experimenting with their ideas or perhaps having their interns do it?
The Science of Organ Exchange and Life Extension
Today's medicine has made a lot of advancements in organ transplantation, offering the possibility of replacing one's heart, liver, and kidneys; even face transplants have been performed offering patients a chance at a new life. Insofar as it is exciting to think about multiple organ swapping in association with the prospect of extended lifespan, it is much more complicated than that. Every organ in your body is perceived by your immune system as "foreign," and typically rejects "foreign" organ transplantations in spite of modern immunosuppressive or anti-rejection drugs. In addition, the legal availability of organ donation is higher demand than supply. In short, the prognosis of organ replacement is limited in extending life because biological age, although is unique to each person, itself is a normal organ failure process of the cellular level, genetic code (DNA), and, physical state of the nervous system. Therefore although organ transplant procedures can provide a vehicle for extended life, they are not a "model" for unlimited human longevity.
The Conspiracy Angle: Are Leaders Like Putin Using It?
Over the years, rumors have surfaced that world leaders receive cutting-edge medical treatment that the average citizen will never access. Take Vladimir Putin, for instance. There's speculation as to whether he is using treatment methods first introduced over a decade ago to remain conscious, active, and young-looking, while he is delicately whining and kicking annoying Terry neighbors. I even remember a conspiracy theory that there are hidden programs and treatments such as organ or stem-cell therapy, that could keep politicians alive for decades.
But let's not get ahead of ourselves, at least not yet understand that there is no verified proof to support any of these organ-exchanging conspiracy theories, use these examples to standardize the length of tenure of ruling leaders like Putin and any others. But, there is at least a factual assumption that the worlds elites do receive the best and most ground-breaking health procedures - and if we look hard enough we can find ourselves a few backsiders that secure the latest experimental treatments that no other human can afford.
Ethical and Humanitarian Questions
Just the idea of extending life through organ exchange raises serious ethical issues. Everything from harvesting organs from compromised unwilling victims to the vulnerability of marginalized groups is an obvious violation of human rights. If medical advances turn out to be available only to political leverage or social elitism; it seems contradictory to provide quality health care across society and may just exacerbate health injustice. Some may lobby for the principle of prolonging the lives of our most influential thinkers, persuade scientists or leaders, may have value depending on an utilitarian principal, who is to say which one holds greater value. Whenever human rights involve a trade off, or - at best - consideration for potential harm, it is always going to create a paradox between utilitarian moral permissibility that can legitimize harm to bring about a desirable outcome, and their consistency with the principle of human rights that assert all lives are of equal importance.
Think Forward: Science, Speculation, and Responsibility
Current studies on human longevity are not considered regarding fitting in organs, but looking at regenerative medicine, stem-cell treatment, and genetic engineering. Whereas one day it could be possible to have regenerative medicine and other methods of stem-cell therapies and genetic research allow everyone not just elites to live better and longer lives.
Until then organ exchange as intended to artificially lengthen the life of powerful individuals is still more science fiction and a conspiracy theory than a proven scientific plausibility. But the issue it raises is real and pertinent and especially as biotechnologies progress.
Conclusion:
Although organ transplantation is an accepted medical practice, the prospect of continually changing organs in order to maintain the life of powerful individuals is both scientifically and ethically flawed. Instead of maintaining the lives of a select few by ethically dubious means, the emphasis of science, and society in general, should be on promoting healthy life for all.
0 Comments